nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP and aggregation
From: Stephen Griffin <stephen.griffin () rcn com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 16:57:36 -0400 (EDT)
In the referenced message, E.B. Dreger said:
* BGP is an EGP, not an IGP
BGP is one half of an IGP, it is the "where to go" half. You generally run another IGP along with it to provide the "how to get there" half. Most folks run isis or ospf to transport router loopbacks and other next-hop information, but still transport the majority of routes via bgp.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP and aggregation, (continued)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Andy Walden (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 11)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 11)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen J. Wilcox (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Richard A Steenbergen (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Forrest W. Christian (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation PS (May 13)