nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP and aggregation
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 18:18:59 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 05:34:39PM -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
[...]
goes down I want each city to announce the local /21. Is this possible? (using either a Cisco router or Zebra)If I was paying for transit, I would want THEM to do the work of delivering it to the right city, without wasting the bandwidth of my circuit (unless they're really close and that circuit is really cheap).
It's 2 different providers, and one is much cheaper than the other. Therefore I want all traffic to come in through city A, unless my circuit to city B is down. -Ralph
Current thread:
- Re: BGP and aggregation, (continued)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Andy Walden (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Andy Walden (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Andy Walden (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 13)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 11)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Ralph Doncaster (May 11)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen Griffin (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Stephen J. Wilcox (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Scott Granados (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation E.B. Dreger (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Richard A Steenbergen (May 12)
- Re: BGP and aggregation Forrest W. Christian (May 12)