nanog mailing list archives

Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks?


From: Mark Turpin <mark-nanog () gomez charter com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 12:04:35 -0500


On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:41:33AM -0700, LeBlanc, Jason wrote something like this:
<snip>

There are some limitations as to where uRPF works, SONET only on GSRs for
example (thanks Cisco).  I believe it will work on 65xx (SUP1A and SUP2 I
think) regardless of interface type.  Impact should be minimal, as it simply
does a lookup in the CEF table, if the route isn't there it discards.  Keep
in mind this is NOT a filter, so the impact is much less, it is simply a CEF
lookup, much more efficient than a filter.  This will get rid of a HUGE
percentage of spoofed packets that hit your network, and would also work
pretty well if you are the source of an attack.  There is some debate as to
whether you must not have ANY RFC1918 space for this to work.  We're trying
to find this out (not a priority), if I get info I'll post.


hmm... either you're being extremely vague, or you misunderstand how RPF works.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/secur_c/scprt5/scdrpf.htm

Its not checking cef to see if a route is there.... its making sure that a packet
received on an interface came in on an interface that is the best return path
to reach that packet.

thereby explaining why multihomed customers will get borked in the event of using rpf.

enjoy,
-mark
-- 
         Support your local medical examiner--die strangely.


Current thread: