nanog mailing list archives
Re: CEOlink
From: Eric Brandwine <ericb () UU NET>
Date: 14 Mar 2002 03:40:20 +0000
"b" == batz <batsy () vapour net> writes:
b> This is a complicated issue. Maybe I'm off base, but Nanog is actually b> really good. Combined with Bugtraq, Incidents, and a virus alert service, b> Nanog plays a vital role. Their only limitation is that they are on the b> Internet. :) Exactly! That's why we need control plane separation. Run SNMP, SSH, telnet, and SNTP (Simple NANOG Transport Protocol) across the management network, so we're sure we have them when we need them. Actually, NANOG does great. Especially during Sept 11, information was disseminated, help was offered and accepted, and except for a couple of idiotic flames, the SNR was high. ARPA designed the thing to withstand nuclear blasts, and while this was not nuclear, it stood up well. ericb -- Eric Brandwine | Apart from hydrogen, the most common thing in the UUNetwork Security | universe is stupidity. ericb () uu net | +1 703 886 6038 | - Harlan Ellison Key fingerprint = 3A39 2C2F D5A0 FC7C 5F60 4118 A84A BD5D 59D7 4E3E
Current thread:
- RE: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray, (continued)
- RE: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Tony Hain (Mar 14)
- Re: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 15)
- Re: Wired: Congress to Enter ICANN Fray Neil J. McRae (Mar 15)
- Re: CEOlink mike harrison (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink Steve Feldman (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Sean Donelan (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Jeff Mcadams (Mar 13)
- ipnmoo (Re: CEOlink) k claffy (Mar 14)
- Message not available
- Re: ipnmoo (Re: CEOlink) k claffy (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink Eric Brandwine (Mar 13)
- Re: CEOlink Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink mike harrison (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 14)
- Re: CEOlink Niels Bakker (Mar 14)