nanog mailing list archives

Re: Sprint peering policy


From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:26:01 -0400


On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 05:56:35PM +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:

This assumes as per a previous point that they exchange routes outside the
region. 

I'll give you this, as I said I was playing devils advocate. I fully agree 
with the concept of regionalized exchanging for small players.

Also, you can now buy transit cheaper than you can buy longhaul circuits
even at perfect utilization. Set local-preference subtract. :) I prefer 
this to hauling traffic from the east to west to east coast just to use a 
peer because you only have the one anyhow *coughcogentcough*.

And as per your hot potato assumption even without your peering they
will still be dragging your inbound from the point of interconnection
nearest the source. And quit pro quo, assuming their big tier 1 peers do
the same then it'll be the same on balance anyway (as they will carry
the traffic in the opposite direction and losses/gains will cancel)

But the traffic they send to you, they get to dump on your Tier 1 provider
a many points all over their network. You'd think that being primarily 
outbound and in a single location would be a good thing, wouldn't you. :)

Theres single points of failure whether with a peer or a transit if your
network is of that size where you dont have redundant interconnects..

There is still a single point of failure between yourself and your network 
provider, but that is not their problem.

The worst kind of failure is the kind where BGP doesn't die.

Hmm okay this is valid, but really.. do they need to spend much time on
you? Economy of scale and all that.. they can automate building filters,
they dont need to worry about alarming small fry bgp sessions, once set
up theres nothing much to do.

You're talking about Tier 1's here... How many engineers does it take to
plug in a line card? <answer left as an excercise for the reader>

But yes, when you put it all together at the end of the day, it's about 
trying to make money and prevent competition. Some networks simply see 
those goals down a different path.

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177  (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA  B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)


Current thread: