nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint peering policy
From: Scott Weeks <surfer () mauislanwanman com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:49:35 -1000 (HST)
: when this situation has existed in other industries, gov't intervention : has always resulted. even when the scope is international. i've not : been able to puzzle out the reason why the world's gov'ts have not : stepped in with some basic interconnection requirements for IP carriers. Let's hope they don't decide to do that. scott
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint peering policy, (continued)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Vijay Gill (Jun 28)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Mike Leber (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Vijay Gill (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Pat Myrto (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy william (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy E.B. Dreger (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Scott Weeks (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Vixie puts his finger squarely on the key issue Re: Sprint peering policy Gordon Cook (Jun 29)
- Re: Vixie puts his finger squarely on the key issue Re: Sprint peering policy Vadim Antonov (Jun 30)
- Re: Vixie puts his finger squarely on the key issue Re: Sprint peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 30)
- Re: Vixie puts his finger squarely on the key issue Re: Sprint peering policy E.B. Dreger (Jun 30)
- Re: Vixie puts his finger squarely on the key issue Re: Sprint Paul Vixie (Jun 30)
- Re: Sprint peering policy David Luyer (Jun 30)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Mike Leber (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Joseph T. Klein (Jun 29)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 29)