nanog mailing list archives
Re: Worldcomm network question
From: blitz <blitz () macronet net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:25:17 -0400
For that and other reasons, Wcom will be bailed out, at taxpayer expense if necessary, for national security reasons.
At 18:19 6/26/02 -0400, you wrote:
Anyone have any ideas, speculation, or info on how adverse future of WCOM would play out for ISPs and such? Among other things, WCOM is the preferred provider of long-haul pipes for DoD.....that can't be good!! just curious rick
Current thread:
- RE: How low can Worldcom stock go?, (continued)
- RE: How low can Worldcom stock go? Deepak Jain (Jun 26)
- RE: How low can Worldcom stock go? Marc Pierrat (Jun 26)
- Re: How low can Worldcom stock go? Richard Irving (Jun 26)
- RE: How low can Worldcom stock go? Vivien M. (Jun 26)
- not the depeering thread again... (RE: How low can Worldcom stock go?) E.B. Dreger (Jun 26)
- RE: How low can Worldcom stock go? Randy Bush (Jun 26)
- RE: How low can Worldcom stock go? blitz (Jun 26)
- Worldcomm network question Richard Forno (Jun 26)
- Re: Worldcomm network question blitz (Jun 26)
- Re: Worldcomm network question Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 26)
- Re: Worldcomm network question Eric Brandwine (Jun 27)
- Re: Worldcomm network question Tatsuya Kawasaki (Jun 28)
- Re: How low can Worldcom stock go? Randy Bush (Jun 26)