nanog mailing list archives

RE: Sprint peering policy


From: alex () yuriev com
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:35:27 -0400 (EDT)


Alex,

*I* can't make any claims, since that would be making a forward-looking
statement, y'know...  and after today's WorldCom "events", I can hardly
say that trusting analysts is a good thing, but if you take the time to do
some research on ALGX, you'll probably see things like: consistency in
meeting Wall St. expectations, a stong management team (after all, they
*did* build MFS), and a conservative balance sheet.  We're talking about
some experienced, reputable good ol' boys who know enough only acquire
profitable businesses for pennies on the dollar, and only build from
success-based capital.  If you take a good, hard look at the company as a
whole, you'll see a company that has yet to deviate from its original
plan, regardless of economic climate, and will tell you is still on target
for profitability. These are all things I've learned from my own due
dilligence via research on the web, and I'm sure you'll find the same.

I know. It is going to be a localy company to add to WCOM, MFNXQ, ADELA, Q
and others like that for exact reasons that you have listed.

Cheers,
Alex


Current thread: