RE: Sprint peering policy

["Mitchell, Dan" <Dan.Mitchell () hosting com>]

RE: Majdi -- I just wanted to thoroughly address Alex's question.

Besides, Allegiance *has* to make it, because I certainly can't go get a job
at WCom anymore, can I? :-)

dem


-----Original Message-----
From: Majdi S. Abbas [mailto:msa () samurai sfo dead-dog com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:48 PM
To: Mitchell, Dan
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: Sprint peering policy


On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:34:42PM -0400, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
> a strong management team (after all, they *did* build MFS)

        ^
        `- I think you have mistaken this for an endorsement.

        And in the age of cooked books, stated revenue can be
misleading, particularly when it looks too good to be true.
I would be very wary of anyone in this business right now,
particularly a CLEC.

        Regardless, I don't think shameless corporate plugs
really belong on NANOG, but I'll allow that perhaps I am in
the minority.

        --msa