nanog mailing list archives
Re: packet inspection and privacy
From: batz <batsy () vapour net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:07:57 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Mark Kent wrote: :I recently claimed that, in the USA, there is a law that prohibits an :ISP from inspecting packets in a telecommunications network for :anything other than traffic statistics or debugging. A similar sentiment was expressed in a presentation at a conference recently by a lawyer, in regards to Canadian law. He(?) suggested that IDS in its current form contravened data interception laws, and maybe some labour laws, I can't remember off hand. Also, debugging and meta-data (mail and packet headers) may be an exception, but only because of of a possible interpretation of this meta-data as equivalent to a postal address or or phone caller information. This may ultimately be the correct interpretation, but it will depend on the influence of the person whose opinion it is. :) It doesn't matter whether you or I think that packet instpection is a legitimate form of network debugging. It matters whether a judge does. Or maybe in this case, a lawyer. -- batz
Current thread:
- packet inspection and privacy Mark Kent (Jun 24)
- Re: packet inspection and privacy Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 24)
- Re: packet inspection and privacy batz (Jun 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: packet inspection and privacy blitz (Jun 24)
- Re: packet inspection and privacy Dave Stewart (Jun 24)
- RE: packet inspection and privacy Mark Radabaugh (Jun 24)
- Re: packet inspection and privacy Dave Stewart (Jun 24)
- Re: packet inspection and privacy Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 24)
- Re: packet inspection and privacy David Charlap (Jun 25)
- Re: packet inspection and privacy Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 25)