RE: Security of DNSBL spam block systems

[Brad Knowles <brad.knowles () skynet be>]

At 2:29 AM -0400 2002/07/23, Phil Rosenthal wrote:

>  IMHO Even the really large DNSBL's are barely used -- I think
>  (much) less than 5% of total human mail recipients are behind
>  a mailserver that uses one...

	Not true.  There are plenty of large sites that use them (e.g., 
AOL), and many sites use them to help ensure that they themselves 
don't get added to the black lists.


	IMO, there is a serious risk of having DNSBL servers attacked and 
used as a DoS.

	The easiest way would be to check to see if the servers being 
used are open public caching recursive servers, in addition to their 
authoritative services.  If so, then they would be open to cache 
poisoning attacks.

	That said, I think the bigger black list services are run by 
people who have at least half a clue as to how a nameserver should be 
operated, and therefore they should be relatively secure.  However, 
they would still be at risk if one of their parent zones is served by 
a nameserver that mixes both authoritative service & 
caching/recursive service, and therefore would be easily subject to 
cache poisoning.

--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles () skynet be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.