nanog mailing list archives
Re: Evil PGP sigs thread must die. was Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in my MUA OT
From: Christian Kuhtz <ck () arch bellsouth net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:12:16 -0400
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:35:01PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
No. It is precisely the public e-mail messages which should always be signed, since they are the ones likely to reach the largest audience, and the ones that are likely to have the biggest negative impact if they are successfully spoofed.
what is amazing is that if this was really that important.. how is it that mankind has gotten this far without the need of authenticating every piece of communication. but what this all has to do with nanog, i don't understand at all.
Current thread:
- Re: Evil PGP sigs thread must die. was Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in my MUA OT Andy Dills (Jul 10)
- Re: Evil PGP sigs thread must die. was Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in my MUA OT Chris Woodfield (Jul 10)
- Re: Evil PGP sigs thread must die. was Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in my MUA OT Brad Knowles (Jul 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Evil PGP sigs thread must die. was Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in my MUA OT Andy Dills (Jul 10)
- Re: Evil PGP sigs thread must die. was Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in my MUA OT Scott Francis (Jul 10)
- Re: Evil PGP sigs thread must die. was Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in my MUA OT Stephen Sprunk (Jul 10)
- Re: Evil PGP sigs thread must die. was Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in my MUA OT Brad Knowles (Jul 15)
- Re: Evil PGP sigs thread must die. was Re: Stop it with putting your e-mail body in my MUA OT Christian Kuhtz (Jul 15)