nanog mailing list archives

Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP


From: Nicole Harrington <nmh () daemontech com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:29:02 -0800 (PST)



 Hi
 Does anyone know of a program that can flag such things and alter mail headers
on the fly like this?


  Nicole


On 28-Feb-02 Unnamed Administration sources reported Jared Mauch said :

On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:35:09PM -0700, Daniel Lark wrote:

You are most correct, it is definitely a double edged sword. Let's say
you try to reverse DNS on an address who's nameserver is down or
otherwise unreachable, what then? Some admins I know deliberately do run
reverse DNS as they view it as system cracker tool, or they feel it is
an unwarranted load, RFCs be damned. Is this admin decision the fault of
the user?

      Use a non clueless isp.  the market is fairly saturated in
most places with service providers.

You are not first one to try this. I have tried this myself and a
financial type didn't get an important email because of it. You know the
rest of the story.

      What I do is format my smtp headers such that a very simple
regex can find mail with no reverse dns and dump it in a spam folder.
I find this catches a lot of the messages.

      I try and let people know but for example, I am unable to
find anyone at American Express or NWA that can fix their dns.
(others are prompt in fixing their dns problems).

A better solution is to check the ip and see if it is an MX record for
the domain the mail purports to be from.

      This has a number of flaws.  I won't delve into them though.

Just my opinion, and I could wrong.

      - Jared


-dan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
Patrick Muldoon
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:15 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Reverse DNS and SMTP


     We have recently implemented a policy on our mail servers of not
accepting mail from hosts that do not correctly resolve via reverse DNS.
While we on the technical side love the idea, there have been some
questions from the business side of the house.  

     If an ISP who doesn't have reverse DNS setup correctly on their
mail servers, we point them to the RFC's and generally offer to help
them correct it.  
     We have noticed that our spam has reduced drastically, and the
complaints are few, but alas this is a double edged sword, where if you
even block 1 legitimate e-mail out of the 100K+ that we receive daily,
someone is going to complain.   

Just curious if anybody here is doing the same and the response that
they have had from doing so.  Replies off list are fine and I will
summarize if people are interested.  

Thanks, 
Patrick

--
Patrick Muldoon, Network/Software Engineer
INOC, LLC
doon () inoc net

Press Ctrl-Alt-Del now for IQ test.



-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.



                     |\ __ /|     (`\            
                     | o_o  |__  ) )           
                    //      \\                 
 Daemon Technologies(tm)  |  Phone: 510.895.9667
 nicole () daemontech com    |  
-------------------(((---(((-----------------------
            -  Powered by FreeBSD  -
     Email, DNS, SiteHosting, FTP Services,
  Dedicated Servers,  Co-Location, and a Lot More
------------------------------------------------------
 " Daemons" will now be known as "spiritual guides"
-Politically Correct UNIX Page



Current thread: