nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP
From: "Conrad A. Rockenhaus" <conradr () skyphusion com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:46:21 -0000
Patrick Muldoon <doon () inoc net> said:
If an ISP who doesn't have reverse DNS setup correctly on their mail servers, we point them to the RFC's and generally offer to help them correct it. We have noticed that our spam has reduced drastically, and the complaints are few, but alas this is a double edged sword, where if you even block 1 legitimate e-mail out of the 100K+ that we receive daily, someone is going to complain.
To be honest, I would do this as a last resort. For example, if their ISP's (or their own, if they have the block delegated) DNS server is misconfigured, etc, you might have a issue. Also, some admins have no clue what reverse dns is, seriously :). I would use a service like MAPS first to see if that resolves the issue, and use this as a last resort. If they don't have an issue with blocking unresolvable ips, then they shouldn't have an issue with just using an rbl ;). --conradr
Current thread:
- Reverse DNS and SMTP Patrick Muldoon (Feb 28)
- RE: Reverse DNS and SMTP Daniel Lark (Feb 28)
- Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP Jared Mauch (Feb 28)
- Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP Nicole Harrington (Feb 28)
- Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP Paul Timmins (Feb 28)
- Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP Chris Adams (Feb 28)
- Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP Jared Mauch (Feb 28)
- RE: Reverse DNS and SMTP Mathias Koerber (Feb 28)
- RE: Reverse DNS and SMTP Daniel Lark (Feb 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Reverse DNS and SMTP Pete Stephenson (Feb 28)
- Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP Conrad A. Rockenhaus (Feb 28)
- Re: Reverse DNS and SMTP David Charlap (Feb 28)