nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management
From: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <nanog () adns net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 02:48:53 -0600
So you support limiting TLDs to make lawyer's lives easier? Now I've heard it all. ----- Original Message ----- From: "BrandonButterworth" <brandon () rd bbc co uk> To: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:34 AM Subject: Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management
The bottom line is that expanding the name space with additional TLDs solves this problem. Then "Two (or more) companies don't *HAVE* to fight for identical flat space" - because they are each given unique space.
Duh!
That was nice until someone decided that they're really trade marks and caused legal people to run around registering in each TLD (you have to collect them all or you're not defending your mark), after that new TLDs were just a license to print money. What a waste. brandon
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management, (continued)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management David Conrad (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Simon Higgs (Feb 27)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management Vadim Antonov (Feb 26)
- RE: Tauzin-Dingell (was ICANN) Daniel Lark (Feb 26)
- Re: Tauzin-Dingell (was ICANN) Patrick (Feb 26)
- Re: ICANN - The Case for Replacing its Management John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Feb 27)