Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth

["Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels () cistron nl>]

In article <cistron.g3lmeao4x1.fsf () as vix com>,
Paul Vixie  <vixie () as vix com> wrote:
> Pull it, rather than pushing it.  nntpcache is a localized example of how
> to only transfer the groups and articles that somebody on your end of a
> link actually wants to read.  A more systemic example ought to be developed
> whereby every group has a well-mirrored home and an nntpcache hierarchy
> similar to what Squid proposed for web data, and every news reader pulls
> only what it needs.  Posting an article should mean getting it into the
> well-mirrored home of that group.  Removing spam should mean deleting
> articles from the well-mirrored home of that group.

Yes, but who's going to set up the home for movies/pictures/warez/mp3
groups? Nobody, ofcourse, since most stuff is not very legal.
But those groups are 98% of todays traffic.

So if you *do* manage to switch everybody over to that new system
and turn off the old usenet, the new system isn't needed anymore.

Mike.
-- 
Computers are useless, they only give answers. --Pablo Picasso