nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL & Cogent
From: Pete Kruckenberg <pete () kruckenberg com>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 22:21:26 -0700 (MST)
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Consider this example: If I buy 100Mbit of transit from AboveNet in IAD, odds are you're gonna peer off 75% of my traffic locally, without it ever having touched expensive longhaul circuits. If I buy 100Mbit of paid peering, odds are you're going to be burning longhaul circuits carrying most of it all over the world, plus the same longhaul carrying it all back to me.
So are any ISPs pricing transit and/or paid-peering bandwidth (significantly) lower if purchased at an exchange point? Pete.
Current thread:
- Re: AOL & Cogent, (continued)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Paul Vixie (Dec 29)
- Re: AOL & Cogent David Diaz (Dec 29)
- Re: AOL & Cogent John Kristoff (Dec 29)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Mike Leber (Dec 29)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Leo Bicknell (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent David Diaz (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Stephen Sprunk (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Paul Vixie (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Paul Vixie (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Pete Kruckenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Basil Kruglov (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Omachonu Ogali (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Basil Kruglov (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Jeff S Wheeler (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent E.B. Dreger (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 30)