nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates
From: Anders Lowinger <anders.lowinger () xelerated com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:57:54 +0100
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Opposite problem -- he wants to delay routing updates if the link is full. EIGRP by default won't use more than 25/50% (I forget) of link bw, for instance, but I'm not aware of any intentional features in other IGPs to do this.
Both OSPF and ISIS in Cisco's have pacing, ie they will not flood LSAs/LSPs over a certain configurable limit. Not sure about other platforms.. -A
Current thread:
- Using link congestion to control routing updates David Scott Olverson (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Alec H. Peterson (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Andy Dills (Dec 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates Ejay Hire (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Stephen Sprunk (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Anders Lowinger (Dec 20)
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates alex (Dec 19)
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 19)
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates Scott Granados (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Stephen Sprunk (Dec 19)
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates Ejay Hire (Dec 20)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Eric Osborne (Dec 20)