nanog mailing list archives
RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates
From: Scott Granados <scott () wworks net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:53:48 -0800 (PST)
Be mindful of your routes Master Luke! On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 alex () yuriev com wrote:IIRC, and I may be wrong, either IS-IS or CLNS (can't remember which) can look at congestion, and EIGRP can look at load if you tweak the K parameters.Silly redistribution of IGP into BGP leads to flapping. Flapping leads to dampening. Dampening leads to suffering.Suffering leads to pain Pain leads to the dark side?
Current thread:
- Using link congestion to control routing updates David Scott Olverson (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Alec H. Peterson (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Andy Dills (Dec 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates Ejay Hire (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Stephen Sprunk (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Anders Lowinger (Dec 20)
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates alex (Dec 19)
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 19)
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates Scott Granados (Dec 19)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Stephen Sprunk (Dec 19)
- RE: Using link congestion to control routing updates Ejay Hire (Dec 20)
- Re: Using link congestion to control routing updates Eric Osborne (Dec 20)