nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks?
From: Allan Liska <allan () allan org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:09:02 -0500
Hello Hansel, Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 3:08:20 PM, you wrote: LH> The SPEWS concept prevents an ISP from allowing spammers on some blocks LH> while trying to service legitimate customers on others. For an ISP - it is LH> either all or none over time, you support spammers and are blocked as a LH> whole (to include innocent customers). Not speaking for or against SPEWS, but couldn't this eventually work against people using the list? If I were a spammer I would keep signing up for accounts, and getting larger and larger blocks of IP Addresses added to the SPEWS list. Eventually, so many blocks would be added to the list, that it would make SPEWS worthless. Once SPEWS is worthless, people will stop using it, and the spammers win. allan -- Allan Liska allan () allan org http://www.allan.org
Current thread:
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks?, (continued)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Scott Granados (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Barry Shein (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Michael . Dillon (Dec 10)
- RE: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Mark Segal (Dec 10)
- RE: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Lee, Hansel (Dec 10)
- RE: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Scott Silzer (Dec 10)
- RE: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? David Schwartz (Dec 10)
- RE: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Scott Silzer (Dec 10)
- RE: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Jason Lixfeld (Dec 10)
- RE: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Scott Silzer (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? David Lesher (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Allan Liska (Dec 10)