nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks?


From: Scott Granados <scott () wworks net>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:50:31 -0800 (PST)


I tend to agree.  We had the same issue a customer who we did not know was
a spammer did something similar and they listed our blocks.  I terminated
the  customer.  I believe spews has a newsgroup that is listed on their
site you can post to but more than that I'm not certain.  Also its funny
how they don't block all the blocks originated by cnw <where the spam in
my case originated> but listed mine.  Either way I think you did the
correct thing the deal now is to post to the newsgroup and let them know
you cleared the issue.

That's all I have heard can be done.


On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Mark Segal wrote:


Before the flame begins..

I'm not sure when this started..

Background:
We have a downstream ISP, who hosts a website of questionable material.
This customer (of our customer) used a third party to spam on their behalf..
Which is a violation of our AUP.  (In fact we null0 the /32 in question).

Problem:
For some reason, spews has decided to now block one of our /19.. Ie no mail
server in the /19 can send mail.

Questions:
1) How do we smack some sense into spews?
2) Does anyone else see a HUGE problem with listing a /19 because there is
one /32 of a spam advertised website?  When did this start happening?

Regards,
Mark

--
Mark Segal
Director, Data Services
Futureway Communications Inc.
Tel: (905)326-1570



Current thread: