nanog mailing list archives

Re: Microslosh vision of the future


From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles () skynet be>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:44:51 +0200


At 11:47 PM -0400 2002/08/11, blitz wrote:

 I just hope the anti-trust people are looking into this....i can't
 see a bigger case for them to spring into action...

Bush just hired the former Microsoft head of security to be his "go-to" man for creating an infrastructure to protect the security of US computer assets.

Do you really think that they will ever again lift a hand against Microsoft? They only participated in the anti-trust action brought by the Clinton white house because they had no choice -- their pulling out of the case would have been far worse than continuing to a settlement that resulted in less than a wrist-slap.


        And it didn't even take Billy-boy a billion to buy the US gov't.

--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles () skynet be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)


Current thread: