nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microslosh vision of the future
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 08:49:48 -0500
Thus spake "Alif The Terrible" <measl () mfn org>
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, gg wrote:Guess my home P.C. will no longer be an intel platform......hello mighty
SPARC
I guess you didn't actually read this, did you? It makes no difference what you use at home, if that machine can't talk to the rest of the world.
1. There will be CPU vendors that won't require Palladium-signed code 2. There will be OSes that won't require Palladium-signed code 3. There will be applications that won't require Palladium-signed code 4. There will be IETF protocols that won't require Palladium-signed code 5. The Net will not require Palladium-signed code and most importantly: 6. This article is completely incorrect on how Palladium will work. S
Current thread:
- Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Kevin Oberman (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future William Warren (Aug 12)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future gg (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Alif The Terrible (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Stephen Sprunk (Aug 12)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Gerardo A. Gregory (Aug 12)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 12)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Alif The Terrible (Aug 12)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Alif The Terrible (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Kevin Oberman (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Vadim Antonov (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future David Schwartz (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Aug 11)
- Message not available
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future blitz (Aug 11)
- Re: Microslosh vision of the future Brad Knowles (Aug 12)