nanog mailing list archives

Re: my sig


From: Scott Granados <scott () graphidelix net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:26:45 -0700 (PDT)


Well as long as under God is kept  out of your sig then the 9th circuit 
court should leave you alone!

On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Dominic J. Eidson wrote:


On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, William Warren wrote:

the sig is removed....I am saddened that my sig was/is considered
obnoxious and self-indulging.  I appreciate the explanations.

There have been much longer much more obnoxious .sig's on this list
before, with no complaints. Go figure, let the anti-religious bigots rule.

IMNSHO, the only valid reason for complaining about the .sig, was the
more-than-4-lines length, but it's fairly obvious that that wasn't the
(main) reason...





Current thread: