nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies
From: smd () clock org (Sean M. Doran)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 19:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
| UUNet suggested that any problems encountered | as a result of this allocation could probably solved by e-mailing | any NSP whose traffic interchange with us might be negatively | affected (unlikely, to be sure, but still...), and would then | change their filter (I'm unconvinced of this scenario). Try offering some money to such NSPs -- it probably doesn't have to be much, and of course you would be receiving substantial benefit... Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies, (continued)
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies Jim Hickstein (Apr 09)
- RE: [Q] BGP filtering policies Borchers, Mark (Apr 09)
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies Henry Yen (Apr 09)
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies Adrian Chadd (Apr 09)
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 09)
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies Henry Yen (Apr 09)
- RE: [Q] BGP filtering policies LeBlanc, Jason (Apr 09)
- RE: [Q] BGP filtering policies Sharif Torpis (Apr 09)
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 09)
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies Jeff Aitken (Apr 09)
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies Christian Nielsen (Apr 10)
- RE: [Q] BGP filtering policies Sharif Torpis (Apr 09)
- Re: [Q] BGP filtering policies Henry Yen (Apr 09)