nanog mailing list archives
RE: multi-homing fixes
From: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin () gnilink net>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 14:02:22 -0400
but this is not really necessary either, if you use an IGP. (But some networks use iBGP rather than an IGP to carry customer routes internally.)
I think it is more than 'some.' Carrying anything in your IGP aside from the links that make up the network and the nodes themselves presents several scaling issues, IMHO. --chris
Current thread:
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joel Baker (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joel Baker (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 01)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Martin, Christian (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Pete Kruckenberg (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Paul Vixie (Sep 02)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Alex Bligh (Sep 02)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Paul A Vixie (Sep 02)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Paul Vixie (Sep 02)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joel Baker (Sep 01)