nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing fixes
From: Alex Bligh <alex () alex org uk>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 16:25:06 +0100
Paul,--On Sunday, 02 September, 2001 8:17 AM -0700 Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com> wrote:
using UDP performance into a predictor of TCP performance. Not only ain't it nec'ily so [1], it is nec'ily not so [2].
Understand [1] well, but not [2]. Care to elaborate? I'd have thought there were trivial counterexamples (i.e. when it 'is so'), f'rinstance when one path has both huge delay and large packet loss. -- Alex Bligh Personal Capacity
Current thread:
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joel Baker (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joel Baker (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 01)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Martin, Christian (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Pete Kruckenberg (Sep 01)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Paul Vixie (Sep 02)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Alex Bligh (Sep 02)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Paul A Vixie (Sep 02)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Paul Vixie (Sep 02)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joel Baker (Sep 01)