nanog mailing list archives
Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect (fwd)
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw () insync net>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:37:25 -0500 (CDT)
Apparently I was indeed wrong. -- Joseph W. Shaw II Network Security Specialist/CCNA Unemployed. Will hack for food. God Bless. Apparently I'm overqualified but undereducated to be employed. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: 11 Sep 2001 17:24:28 -0400 From: Robert E. Seastrom <rs () seastrom com> To: Joe Shaw <jshaw () insync net> Cc: rs () valhalla seastrom com Subject: Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect Joe Shaw <jshaw () insync net> writes:
I know I and others have said it before, but this is an excellent use for HAM radios. There's no license requirements to use in emergency situations.
You need to read Part 97 again. You can't just go firing up on amateur frequencies because there is a state of emergency declared. You must be acting to mitigate an immediate threat to human life. And then any frequency is fair game, not just amateur frequencies. Regards, ---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect (fwd) Joe Shaw (Sep 11)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect (fwd) John Fraizer (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect (fwd) Andy Walden (Sep 12)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect (fwd) Jim Dixon (Sep 12)
- Re: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect (fwd) Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 12)