nanog mailing list archives
RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset)
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:27:05 -0700
|> From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com] |> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 1:19 PM |> |> note that richer meshes may increase forwarding reliability but they |> exacerbate routing convergence problems. see abha's nanog |> presentation. for many of us, forwarding reliability is what it's all about and convergence is what we pay you for. Are you saying that isn't factored into COGs?
Current thread:
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Dickson, Brian (Sep 24)
- NATURE: Error and attack tolerance of complex networks Anthony Townsend (Sep 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Roeland Meyer (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) George William Herbert (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Travis Pugh (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Sean Donelan (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Travis Pugh (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Travis Pugh (Sep 25)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Roeland Meyer (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) George William Herbert (Sep 25)