nanog mailing list archives
RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset)
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:08:43 -0700
|> From: Sean Donelan [mailto:sean () donelan com] |> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 5:00 PM |> Under the new Anti-Terrorism Act, damaging communication lines, |> stations or systems would become a Federal Terrorism Offense. |> |> I feel sorry for the backhoe operators. Why? Maybe this will square that act away.
Current thread:
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Dickson, Brian (Sep 24)
- NATURE: Error and attack tolerance of complex networks Anthony Townsend (Sep 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Roeland Meyer (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) George William Herbert (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Travis Pugh (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Sean Donelan (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Travis Pugh (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Travis Pugh (Sep 25)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Roeland Meyer (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) George William Herbert (Sep 25)