nanog mailing list archives

Re: Tri-GigE or OC-48 For Milwaukee > Chicago Network

From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:07:28 +0000 (UCT)



 You already asked these questions in another fora and received your 
 answers there. Please resist the cycle of multiple crosspostings.



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
      charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear List:

We are going to be offering 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet Services to =
Milwaukee, WI. We are also opening a 15,000 Sq. Foot Carrier-Neutral =
Collocation Facility. In order to connect our clients to the public =
peering exchanges in Chicago do you think we should install multiple =
Cisco 12,000 series routers in multiple POPs in Downtown Chicago, and =
then transport all of the data back to the Milwaukee Datacenter via =
Gigabit Ethernet lines (and then connect those gigabit Ethernet lines =
into Cisco Switches at the Milwaukee Datacenter) or bring the data back =
on one redundant OC-48 and have a router in Milwaukee to break up the =
OC-48?

Also, Juniper or Cisco for this situation? What would you go with?
----------------------
Nick Catalano
Chief Strategy Officer
Nozone, Inc

Services from the next generation - Nozone, Inc

------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0
Content-Type: text/html;
      charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Dear List:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>We are going to be offering 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet =
Services=20
to Milwaukee, WI. We are also opening a 15,000 Sq. Foot Carrier-Neutral=20
Collocation Facility. In order to connect our clients to the public =
peering=20
exchanges in Chicago do you think we should install multiple Cisco =
12,000 series=20
routers in multiple POPs in Downtown Chicago, and then transport all of =
the data=20
back to the Milwaukee Datacenter via Gigabit Ethernet lines (and then =
connect=20
those gigabit Ethernet lines into Cisco Switches at the Milwaukee =
Datacenter) or=20
bring the data back on one redundant OC-48 and have a router in =
Milwaukee to=20
break up the OC-48?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Also, Juniper or Cisco for this situation? What =
would you go=20
with?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>----------------------<BR>Nick Catalano<BR>Chief =
Strategy=20
Officer<BR>Nozone, Inc</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Services from the next generation - Nozone,=20
Inc</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0--

Current thread:

Tri-GigE or OC-48 For Milwaukee > Chicago Network Nick Catalano (Sep 21)
- Re: Tri-GigE or OC-48 For Milwaukee > Chicago Network bmanning (Sep 21)