nanog mailing list archives
Re: Afghanistan
From: "Tim Devries" <tim.devries () inquent com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:54:21 -0700
What about all other nations and states? I think that type of information would be useful regardless of this particular situation. Anyone know if arin et al catagorizes and publishes this information? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan J . Mehl" <memory-nanog () blank org> To: <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:45 AM Subject: Re: Afghanistan
In the immortal words of Tim Devries (tim.devries () inquent com):Does anyone even have a list of IP blocks allocated on a national or regional level?"None" and "none." Afghanistan barely has working voice phone service, and the Taliban issued an edict banning all computers and most especially internet access several months ago. Note reply-to. -n ------------------------------------------------------------<memory@blank.
org>
"Thus do `Snuff Movies' take their place with `Political-Correctness,'
`Sex
Addiction,' and `Postmodernism' as Godzillas of bogus moral panic, always threatening to crush the nation in their jaws, but never quite willing to
take
the final step of biting down.
(--www.suck.com)
<http://blank.org/memory/>-------------------------------------------------- --
Current thread:
- Re: Afghanistan, (continued)
- Re: Afghanistan Todd Suiter (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Todd Suiter (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Vadim Antonov (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Curtis Maurand (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Ng Pheng Siong (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] David VanHorn (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan Nathan J . Mehl (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Tim Devries (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Marshall Eubanks (Sep 18)
- RE: Afghanistan ginny listman (Sep 19)