nanog mailing list archives
RE: Afghanistan
From: "Hallgren, Michael" <michael.hallgren () Teleglobe com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 18:59:47 +0100
At 11:43 AM 9/18/2001 -0500, Basil Kruglov wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 12:23:58PM -0400, Smith, Rick wrote: >> Has anyone started to deny all traffic to/from Afghanistan ? >> >> Wouldn't that be worth it ? >> >> Or did I miss that post? > >Do they even have Internet? > >http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/af.html >Internet Service Providers (ISPs): NA It is my understanding that the free flow of ideas and discussion of same is detrimental to an extremist or dictatorial government. Such governments rarely (ever?) survive open discussions and flow of ideas. Either that, or their beliefs are so strongly held, so pure, so obvious that other ideas / beliefs need not even be examined. Apparently the "boys and girls" are simply told what to believe, and the reasoning behind or, or counter arguments to it, are irrelevant. No discussion or substantiation is necessary, "people with clue" told them so. I vote for #1. What does the rest of NANOG think?
#1, (provided the open minded people over there do enjoy access to such a free flow of information, something I can't tell from my horizon.) mh
>-Basil -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Afghanistan, (continued)
- Re: Afghanistan Todd Suiter (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Vadim Antonov (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Curtis Maurand (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] Ng Pheng Siong (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan [OT] David VanHorn (Sep 19)
- Re: Afghanistan Nathan J . Mehl (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Tim Devries (Sep 18)
- Re: Afghanistan Marshall Eubanks (Sep 18)
- RE: Afghanistan ginny listman (Sep 19)