nanog mailing list archives
RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out
From: "Quibell, Marc" <mquibell () icn state ia us>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:10:16 -0500
LOL! I believe that the question should be: Why are you pinging me? Tell me what admin who sees thousands of ping from one host does not investigation the nature? Do mean to say that if you were to log thousands of pings, you would ignore them? Also many ping attacks start with harmless ping probes. Marc -----Original Message----- From: James Thomason [mailto:james () divide org] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:00 PM To: Patrick W. Gilmore Cc: nanog () merit edu; Quibell, Marc Subject: RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out If I did, and they responded negatively, I would tell them YOU said it was a good idea. Seriously, why should the administrators of *.army.mil care if I test packet response time between our networks? Is this an illegal activity I am unaware of? On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
At 02:16 PM 10/26/2001 -0500, Quibell, Marc wrote: > >Maybe you should ping NS01.ARMY.MIL about 2400 times in 3 hour and see
if
>you don't get a visit? Pinging a website 2 times means nothing.. How about 441 times in 2 hours? :) >Marc -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Quibell, Marc (Oct 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- Re: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Quibell, Marc (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- Re: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Stephen Griffin (Oct 28)