Re: Traffic Shape or Rate Limit

["E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>]

> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 14:37:59 -0500
> From: John Kristoff <jtk () depaul edu>

> > Consider also RED variants versus simple tail-drop.
>
> Yes, if you know me that goes without saying, however I know a

(That I do not... still pretty new on NANOG.)

> number of a number of folks, particularly at large ISPs that
> are opposed to RED for one technical reason or another.

I've seen papers/posts for, against, and neutral on, various RED
flavors.  Rather than start a flame war or dig up bookmarks, I
decided to bring up the subject and effectively say "STFW". :-)

One probably should mention, too, that there are various queueing
disciplines besides the [seemingly] most ubiquitous RED.  Any
others would probably require consideration of hardware used.


Eddy

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com>
To: blacklist () brics com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to be blocked.