nanog mailing list archives

RE: Traffic Shape or Rate Limit


From: "Deepak Jain" <deepak () ai net>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:51:39 -0400



Everything drops packets if you fill the buffers...

Rate limiting vs Traffic Shaping is about intent and QoS in my experience.

YMMV

Deepak Jain
AiNET

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Christopher J. Wolff
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:36 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Traffic Shape or Rate Limit



Hello,

I'm wondering what the list's opinions are on Traffic-Shaping vs. Rate-Limit
for DIA customers (Frac DS3, for example).  From what I've read, Traffic
Shaping is a better option since it doesn't drop packets.  Just curious as
to what the opinions are.

Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, VP, CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
email:chris () bblabs com
phone:520.622.4338 x234



Current thread: