nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP noise tonight? (fwd)


From: abha <ahuja () wibh net>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:41:47 -0700 (PDT)



Did a lot of folks get affected by this?  Any news on what caused the
bogus path?

Anyone have contacts at 2008?

(transit ASes deleted) ?3?64603? 2008

-abha ;)
(an inquiring mind who wants to know... *grin*)

On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Christopher A. Woodfield wrote:


All prefixes originating from AS2008 dissapeared from our feeds at
approx. 9:30pm EDT. About an hour later, I noticed that the prefixes were
back, but no longer carrying the malformed path.

-Chris

On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 12:52:18AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:

So who do you blame...the RFC or the vendor that ignores it?  Dropping the
session seems to break the "be conservative in what you send and liberal
in what you accept" suggestion.  If you know someone else will ignore the
rules (there's always someone) breaking due to their error kind of sucks.

is there a proof of termination of this path?

--
---------------------------
Christopher A. Woodfield              rekoil () semihuman com

PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B



Current thread: