nanog mailing list archives
Re: wireless traffic
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 00:11:57 -0500
lucent and aironet (later cisco) never made wired cards so I wouldn't expect that. also, I think that the non-ieee lists tend to have more/better data on prefixs. I bet snort or etherpeek or ethereal or sniffer or someone like that has a decent aui list.
they might never have made cards you could plug into your pc or mac, per se, but cisco at least has made quite a name for itself by manufacturing a large pile of *other* networking equipment. a fair amount of which uses the same addressing style. :) -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| codewarrior () daemon org * "ah! i see you have the internet twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" andrew () crossbar com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
Current thread:
- wireless traffic Art Houle (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andrew Brown (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Antony (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andy Ellifson (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Rodney Thayer (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Kevin Oberman (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Rodney Thayer (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andrew Brown (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Rodney Thayer (Nov 11)
- Re: wireless traffic Kevin Oberman (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: wireless traffic Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Spencer . Wood (Nov 09)
- RE: wireless traffic Dave O'Shea (Nov 09)
- RE: wireless traffic measl (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andrew Brown (Nov 09)