nanog mailing list archives
Re: wireless traffic
From: Rodney Thayer <rodney () tillerman to>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 16:43:45 -0800
lucent and aironet (later cisco) never made wired cards so I wouldn't expect that. also, I think that the non-ieee lists tend to have more/better data on prefixs. I bet snort or etherpeek or ethereal or sniffer or someone like that has a decent aui list. also, of course, manufacturers know that no real people use network management so why bother to document your aui? a manufacturer who keeps their aui secret is offering to live in a non-sales-enhancing position... At 10:26 AM 11/9/2001 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
The problem with this is that manufacturers have the option of not allowing the IEEE to disclose this and many (most) wireless card makers also make wired cards that share the same AUI prefix.
Current thread:
- wireless traffic Art Houle (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andrew Brown (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Antony (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andy Ellifson (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Rodney Thayer (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Kevin Oberman (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Rodney Thayer (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andrew Brown (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Rodney Thayer (Nov 11)
- Re: wireless traffic Kevin Oberman (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: wireless traffic Steven M. Bellovin (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Spencer . Wood (Nov 09)
- RE: wireless traffic Dave O'Shea (Nov 09)
- RE: wireless traffic measl (Nov 09)
- Re: wireless traffic Andrew Brown (Nov 09)