nanog mailing list archives
Re: EMAIL != FTP
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:29:46 -0400
On Fri, 25 May 2001 11:45:13 EDT, Robert Blayzor said:
Right, but let's not leave out the attchment honorable mentions, things like ILOVEYOU, Snowwhite, etc. ;-) Perfect example of how email attachments can start a wildfire.
It's not the attachments that's the problem. It's companies that sell software
that looks at attachments with a fundementally screwed-up security model.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Stealth Blocking, (continued)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Adam Rothschild (May 25)
- EMAIL != FTP John Fraizer (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Mitch Halmu (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Jim Mercer (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Shawn McMahon (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP John Fraizer (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Jim Mercer (May 25)
- EMAIl ==> MAIL ==> parsels + letters Alexei Roudnev (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP M. David Leonard (May 25)
- RE: EMAIL != FTP Robert Blayzor (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Valdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
- RE: EMAIL != FTP Robert Blayzor (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Wayne Bouchard (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Alexei Roudnev (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP David Charlap (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Jim Mercer (May 25)
- RE: EMAIL != FTP Robert Blayzor (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Alexei Roudnev (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Greg Maxwell (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP Mitch Halmu (May 25)
- Re: EMAIL != FTP John Fraizer (May 25)