nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stealth Blocking
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 12:43:45 -0400
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:12:56PM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
Absolutely not. Our entire Norte Americano culture is biased AGAINST apriori restrictions. You DO NOT spank someone for something that they have NOT, in fact, done.
Leash laws. Prohibitions on minors buying spray paint. Speeding laws.
I think we have [only] a slight disconnect here. ident is part of the protocol. [side note: I'm setting up a new Postfix host (my first Postfix
Ident is a completely seperate protocol. Saying ident is part of SMTP is like saying TCP/IP is. Ident is optionally used by SMTP, but it's not a part of it.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking), (continued)
- Re: Scanning (was Re: Stealth Blocking) Christopher A. Woodfield (May 27)
- Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning) Albert Meyer (May 27)
- RE: Stealth Blocking jlewis (May 24)
- RE: Stealth Blocking alex (May 24)
- network policy (was Re: Stealth Blocking) Paul Vixie (May 25)
- Re: network policy (was Re: Stealth Blocking) Paul Vixie (May 26)
- RE: Stealth Blocking David Schwartz (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking David Schwartz (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Christopher B. Zydel (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking David Schwartz (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)