nanog mailing list archives
RE: Stealth Blocking
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 19:02:45 -0700
From: Christopher B. Zydel [mailto:czydel () cv net] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:03 PM
ISPs that subscribe to MAPS RBL are saying that they believe that open relays should not exist, that MAPS should be able to test for this condition, and that they don't want to receive e-mail from non-compliant hosts.
This is the source of confusion... right here. This person does not know the difference between MAPS and ORBS.
Current thread:
- Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning), (continued)
- Re: ORBS (Re: Scanning) Albert Meyer (May 27)
- RE: Stealth Blocking jlewis (May 24)
- RE: Stealth Blocking alex (May 24)
- network policy (was Re: Stealth Blocking) Paul Vixie (May 25)
- Re: network policy (was Re: Stealth Blocking) Paul Vixie (May 26)
- RE: Stealth Blocking David Schwartz (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking David Schwartz (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Christopher B. Zydel (May 23)
- RE: Stealth Blocking David Schwartz (May 23)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Eric A. Hall (May 24)
- Re: Stealth Blocking Shawn McMahon (May 24)