nanog mailing list archives
Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () darkwing uoregon edu>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 18:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 31 May 2001 horape () tinuviel compendium net ar wrote:
Why should it be so great deal? It should allow me only to add filters on the traffic that is destined to me, not arbitrary filters...
Filters have a non-zero impact on cpu overhead. Where they end up in the forwarding path could negativly affect your upstream or other routers in a fashion that's signficantly worse than the attack on you affects them... The potential for someone at isp B to do engineering on the way that traffic from isp A's customers flow to isp B on isp A's routers ought to be fairly disturbing to most folks. Normally that's something that both parties have to agree on first.
Current thread:
- engineering --> ddos and flooding Andrew Dorsett (May 31)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Jared Mauch (May 31)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Andrew Dorsett (May 31)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Joel Jaeggli (May 31)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Geoff Z (May 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Steven M. Bellovin (May 31)
- Re: engineering --> ddos and flooding Joel Jaeggli (May 31)