nanog mailing list archives
Re: QOS or more bandwidth
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred () dargo gwi net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 09:01:02 -0400
On 28 May 2001 23:17:46 -0700 Sean Donelan wrote:
While its generally more effective to add more bandwidth than rationing it with QOS, with the recent downturn in capital markets will QOS become more popular?
You are asking for projections in a scenerio where bandwidth demand drops, and bandwidth supply remains constant or grows. Projection: Bandwidth prices are dropping. QOS still sucks. regards, fletcher
Current thread:
- QOS or more bandwidth Sean Donelan (May 28)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Fletcher E Kittredge (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth E.B. Dreger (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Stephen J. Wilcox (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Fletcher E Kittredge (May 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Frank Coluccio (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Ukyo Kuonji (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Pete Kruckenberg (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- Re: QOS or more bandwidth RJ Atkinson (May 29)
- RE: QOS or more bandwidth Sean M. Doran (May 29)