nanog mailing list archives
Re: Clear Channel on a T1
From: Rachel Warren <rachel () telco-bitch com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:06:57 -0500
Here's a document that further obfuscates the matter for me - http://www.comtest.com/tutorials/t1.html Anybody care to comment on its relevance in this situation? If I read it correctly, Clear Channel = Less Capacity. Doesn't sound right.
I know that most of NANOG has explained in detail about clear channel T1s, but I thought this webpage would be a lot of help if you never wanted to learn everything about T1s, but asked anyway! 8-) www.t1.org - Standards Committee T1 Telecommunications. This webpage helped quite a bit when I was researching about T1/T3 test patterns (which is document tr_25.pdf,"A Technical Report on Test Patterns for DS1 Circuits"). A more specific weblink is http://www.t1.org/html/trs.htm I'm now going to unsubscribe to nanog-post before I do something brain dead, e.g., continue a flamewar about DNS. FYI, Rachel -- C++ - Where only your friends can access your private parts.
Current thread:
- Clear Channel on a T1 CARL . P . HIRSCH (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Terrence Chatfield (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Jason A. Mills (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 CARL . P . HIRSCH (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Brett Frankenberger (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Terrence Chatfield (Mar 22)
- RE: Clear Channel on a T1 Christian Kuhtz (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Douglas A. Dever (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Rachel Warren (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Ron Buchalski (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Majdi S. Abbas (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Ron Buchalski (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Ron Buchalski (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Christopher A. Woodfield (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 lucifer (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Peter Galbavy (Mar 26)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Christopher A. Woodfield (Mar 23)