nanog mailing list archives
Re: Clear Channel on a T1
From: "Douglas A. Dever" <dever () hq oh verio net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:56:46 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 CARL.P.HIRSCH () sargentlundy com wrote:
Salesdroid asks "You wanna give us $$$ for clear channel?" Us: "..... ?" Salesdroid: "It's so you can get 64kbit rather than the normal 56k"
I'm quite suprised they'd offer you a data circuit that wasn't b8zs. I think they're just using this as a way to get an extra couple of bucks per month per circuit. Without falling into a long discorse about timing on a DS1, the bottom line is that you get ~1.54Mbit/sec because the data stream is manipulated to maintain timing. A non-clear channel data circuit would only use 7 bits for data, with the 8th bit always being a 1 to maintain timing. Now I'm curious... Can anyone give me a situation where it would be "better" to have a non-clear channel data circuit? -- Douglas A. Dever Network Engineering Manager dever () verio net "We put the fuse in dot bomb." -- Dan Lowe on failed Sun Microsystems Ad Campaign
Current thread:
- Clear Channel on a T1 CARL . P . HIRSCH (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Terrence Chatfield (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Jason A. Mills (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 CARL . P . HIRSCH (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Brett Frankenberger (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Terrence Chatfield (Mar 22)
- RE: Clear Channel on a T1 Christian Kuhtz (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Douglas A. Dever (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Rachel Warren (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Ron Buchalski (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Majdi S. Abbas (Mar 22)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Ron Buchalski (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Ron Buchalski (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Christopher A. Woodfield (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 lucifer (Mar 23)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Peter Galbavy (Mar 26)
- Re: Clear Channel on a T1 Christopher A. Woodfield (Mar 23)