nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL holes again.
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:14:37 -0500
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 01:19:39PM -0800, David Schwartz wrote:
Of course, the real questions are whether this law even applies to email and whether contractual provisions trump it. As I've said many, many times,
Well, as far as the question of whether it applies to email or not, that's been settled. See Steve Jackson Games v. Secret Service.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: AOL holes again., (continued)
- Re: AOL holes again. Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)
- RE: AOL holes again. David Schwartz (Mar 21)
- RE: AOL holes again. Dan Hollis (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Matt Levine (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Steve Sobol (Mar 21)