nanog mailing list archives
RE: AOL holes again.
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:13:46 -0800
From: Shawn McMahon [mailto:smcmahon () eiv com] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 8:50 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: AOL holes again. On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:55:05AM -0800, Roeland Meyer wrote:But, it would be trivial to claim exemption by contractualagreement. Readthe AOL TOS please. There are clauses in there thatspecifically allow AOLto monitor, modify, or delete email messages at-will. Backin the old days,AOL actually had volunteers going through theirmessage-base, regularly,monitoring and deleting content that didn't meet AOL criteria.You can't modify federal law with a contract.
Tell that to the ICANN <g>. You can't sign away your civil-rights, but you can assign agents to perform specific tasks related to them. I have an MBE, in Colorado, that I pay to toss anything that is either "Bulk Rate" or to "Resident" (junk mail). They have no problems doing that, as my agent, even if it involves federal issues. They've been doing that job for years. I have similar arrangements here in California. Otherwise, I'd have to hire separate haulers to dump the junk-mail. Yes, that's US Postal Service delivered mail, under Feral regulation. Anyone signing the AOL agreement is making the same sort of arrangement. Again, I suggest a reading of the AOL TOS. The only way you are exempt from that TOS is to not use AOL (not a bad idea). Simply say "no".
Current thread:
- Re: AOL holes again., (continued)
- Re: AOL holes again. James M. Shuler III (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Wayne (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 20)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 20)
- RE: AOL holes again. David Schwartz (Mar 21)
- RE: AOL holes again. Dan Hollis (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Matt Levine (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Shawn McMahon (Mar 21)
- Re: AOL holes again. Steve Sobol (Mar 21)