nanog mailing list archives
RE: Statements against new.net?
From: <mdevney () teamsphere com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:46:34 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Roeland Meyer wrote:
You're kidding, right? After what MHSC just went through, if someone were to offer a routable/portable /24, my only response would be to ask where you wanted the body delivered. It would be warm and cooling upon delivery. Portable/routable IP addresses are MORE desireable than domain names.
Yes -- but no one IP is any more or less desirable than any other IP, assuming both are portable, routable, and routed. Not so with domain names. Anyone want to guess how much sex.com would sell for? As opposed to, say, jkl.cx ... Matthew Devney
Current thread:
- Re: Statements against new.net?, (continued)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Simon Higgs (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Mathias Koerber (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Michael Shields (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Joe Abley (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Shawn McMahon (Mar 15)
- IP<->IP translation (was re: Statements against new.net?) Clayton Fiske (Mar 15)
- RE: Statements against new.net? mdevney (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 15)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Adam Rothschild (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Adam Rothschild (Mar 16)
- RE: Statements against new.net? Miles Fidelman (Mar 16)
- Re: Statements against new.net? Peter Galbavy (Mar 16)