nanog mailing list archives
Re: new.net
From: Scott Gifford <sgifford () tir com>
Date: 09 Mar 2001 13:07:15 -0500
richb () pioneer ci net writes:
Corporate entities should be *required* to register in the flat dot-com namespace, IMHO, and not be *allowed* names in any other namespace.
I like the idea of creating a new ".tm" TLD (or something less likely to conflict with a CCTLD), and requiring anybody who wants trademark protection to register there; everything else is a free-for-all, as it pretty much is now. Let them have their little trademark disputes over there, and let less litigious heads rule in the other TLDs. -----ScottG.
Current thread:
- Re: new.net richb (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Jim Dixon (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net richb (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Jim Dixon (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net richb (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Simon Lockhart (Mar 08)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Charles Scott (Mar 09)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Charles Scott (Mar 10)
- RE: new.net Mike Batchelor (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Scott Gifford (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net David Schwartz (Mar 09)
- Re: new.net Josh Richards (Mar 10)
- Re: new.net Jim Dixon (Mar 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: new.net richb (Mar 08)